THE PROMPT LIBRARY

Better prompts.
Better starting points.

Find a clear starting point for your next task. Search, make it yours, and open it in ChatGPT.

1,341 prompts

Ready to make your own

SEO & Content

Prompt 34: Plan a Wikipedia Citation Reclamation Campaign

Plans a compliant Wikipedia citation reclamation campaign with target articles, a Talk-page template, and etiquette rules.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a Wikipedia citation strategist who has secured citations without triggering conflict-of-interest reverts. The campaign works only when proposals are made on the article's Talk page with a genuinely better source. Plan my Wikipedia citation reclamation campaign. Give me the answer…

View prompt

Act as a Wikipedia citation strategist who has secured citations without triggering conflict-of-interest reverts. The campaign works only when proposals are made on the article's Talk page with a genuinely better source.
Plan my Wikipedia citation reclamation campaign. Give me the answer in three parts:
● A table of 5 to 10 target articles, each with the article title, URL, the specific dead-link or citation-needed tag location, the asset of mine that would replace it, and why it is a one-to-one match in 25 words or fewer.
● A Talk-page proposal template of 200 words or fewer that names the claim, notes the broken citation, proposes my source with a one-sentence methodology note, and leaves the final decision to editors.
● The non-negotiable etiquette rules: propose on the Talk page only, disclose any conflict of interest, propose no more than one citation per article per month, keep brand promotion out of the proposal, and accept a revert without re-submitting.
As you write it:
● Recommend only articles where I have a genuinely fitting existing asset; do not suggest manufacturing assets for Wikipedia.
● Make sure every target article has a verified dead-link or citation-needed tag.
My details: [Insert your industry or topic domain, the data assets you have published with URLs and short descriptions, and any Wikipedia articles you suspect have dead citations. If you have no targets yet, paste your industry and assets.]

SEO & Content

Compare Earned vs. Bought Strategies Side-by-Side

Delivers a board-ready risk and ROI comparison of earned versus bought links with talking points for stakeholder pushback.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as an SEO risk analyst who has documented the differences between earned and bought link strategies across Google core updates. The comparison must hold up in a board meeting. Produce a side-by-side comparison of earned-authority and bought-link strategies, tailored to my…

View prompt

Act as an SEO risk analyst who has documented the differences between earned and bought link strategies across Google core updates. The comparison must hold up in a board meeting.

Produce a side-by-side comparison of earned-authority and bought-link strategies, tailored to my context, that I can use to push back on link-buying shortcuts. Give me a comparison table with one row per criterion and a column for each strategy, covering:

- Year 1 initial cost, and Year 2-and-beyond ongoing cost.
- Time to first measurable result, and compounding behaviour over time.
- Algorithm-update risk, and brand-reputation risk.
- Discoverability if audited, 12-month ROI, 36-month ROI, and recovery cost if penalised.

Then add three business-language talking points for stakeholder pushback, each one expanded sentence, and a one-line bottom line I could say verbatim in a budget meeting.

As you write it:
- Fill every cell with a specific value or descriptive range; leave nothing blank.
- Keep the talking points in business language, not SEO jargon.
- Frame the comparison in risk and ROI terms; do not moralise about white hat versus black hat.

My details: [Insert the stakeholder pressure you face, such as a request to buy links at a set price, plus your domain size, competitive vertical, and recent algorithm updates affecting your space.]

SEO & Content

Prompt 31: Compare Earned vs. Bought Strategies Side-by-Side

Builds a board-ready earned-versus-bought link comparison table with ROI, risk, and stakeholder talking points.

PROMPT PREVIEW

View prompt

Act as an SEO risk analyst who has documented the differences between earned and bought link strategies across Google core updates. The comparison must hold up in a board meeting. Produce a side-by-side comparison of earned-authority and bought-link strategies, tailored to my context, that I can use to push back on link-buying shortcuts. Give me a comparison table with one row per criterion and a column for each strategy, covering:
● Year 1 initial cost, and Year 2-and-beyond ongoing cost.
● Time to first measurable result, and compounding behaviour over time.
● Algorithm-update risk, and brand-reputation risk.
● Discoverability if audited, 12-month ROI, 36-month ROI, and recovery cost if penalised.
Then add three business-language talking points for stakeholder pushback, each one expanded sentence, and a one-line bottom line I could say verbatim in a budget meeting.
As you write it:
● Fill every cell with a specific value or descriptive range; leave nothing blank.
● Keep the talking points in business language, not SEO jargon.
● Frame the comparison in risk and ROI terms; do not moralise about white hat versus black hat.
My details: [Insert the stakeholder pressure you face, such as a request to buy links at a set price, plus your domain size, competitive vertical, and recent algorithm updates affecting your space.]

Measurement and Improvement

Draft My Executive Board ROI Report

Produces a one-page revenue-focused quarterly ROI report with core metrics, cost-and-effort analysis, and a specific budget ask.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a marketing operations director who has won budget growth by reporting earned-authority results as revenue rather than link counts. Draft a one-page executive ROI report for my last quarter, in the language of revenue, with the budget ask attached. Give…

View prompt

Act as a marketing operations director who has won budget growth by reporting earned-authority results as revenue rather than link counts.

Draft a one-page executive ROI report for my last quarter, in the language of revenue, with the budget ask attached. Give me a report of 600 words or fewer with these sections:

- A bottom line of 30 words or fewer stating what the quarter produced in business terms.
- Three core metrics: organic traffic lift with quarter-over-quarter and 12-month change; referral quality with time on site, bounce rate, and conversion rate against a paid baseline; and assisted conversions with the count and estimated revenue. One sentence each on why it matters.
- A cost-and-effort section with team hours, the equivalent paid-media spend, and an effective ROI multiple.
- A specific budget ask for next quarter, 60 words or fewer, plus two short risk or watch-items.

As you write it:
- Lead with traffic, conversion, or revenue, never link count.
- Give every metric a specific number, not "improved" or "increased".
- Make the budget ask a specific dollar amount or hire, not "more support".
- Do not use "leverage", "synergy", "holistic", or "robust".

My details: [Insert your quarter-over-quarter organic traffic, referral-quality metrics, multi-touch conversion data, team hours invested, and your CFO's preferred budget-ask format if known.]

SEO & Content

Set Realistic Ranking Timeline Expectations

Creates a stakeholder memo with four timeline intervals explaining what to expect and what not to read as failure during a link campaign.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as an SEO strategist who has briefed stakeholders on realistic link-building timelines. Stakeholders panic in week 4 if they were never briefed, and that is when good strategies get killed. Draft the timeline-expectations memo I send to stakeholders before the campaign…

View prompt

Act as an SEO strategist who has briefed stakeholders on realistic link-building timelines. Stakeholders panic in week 4 if they were never briefed, and that is when good strategies get killed.

Draft the timeline-expectations memo I send to stakeholders before the campaign starts. Give me a memo with these parts:

- A short version stating that new backlinks typically take around 10 weeks to show noticeable ranking effects and that full impact accumulates over 3 to 12 months.
- Four interval sections, covering weeks 1 to 4, 5 to 10, 11 to 26, and 27 to 52, each naming what is happening, what stakeholders will see, and what they should not read as failure.
- A closing "what this is not" note: this is not performance marketing, and killing the strategy in week 6 wastes everything invested before week 11.

As you write it:
- Keep all timeline numbers consistent with a 10-week baseline and a 3-to-12-month full-impact window.
- Do not promise specific ranking positions or traffic percentages.
- Give every interval explicit guidance on what not to read as failure.
- Cite specific algorithm behaviour such as re-crawl windows; avoid vague reassurance like "patience pays off".

My details: [Insert your stakeholder and their SEO sophistication, your campaign start date, your current organic traffic baseline, and the target keywords or pages you want to lift.]

Measurement and Improvement

Map My System Health Metrics

Builds a five-metric process dashboard with baselines, 90-day targets, and intervention triggers to detect a stalling link flywheel.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a digital PR systems analyst who builds dashboards that flag a stalling flywheel before raw link volume drops. Process metrics reward building the engine; raw link volume rewards cheap citations. Build my system-health dashboard of the five core process metrics…

View prompt

Act as a digital PR systems analyst who builds dashboards that flag a stalling flywheel before raw link volume drops. Process metrics reward building the engine; raw link volume rewards cheap citations.

Build my system-health dashboard of the five core process metrics that show whether the flywheel is gaining momentum. Give me a table with exactly 5 rows and these columns:

- Metric name, a process metric only, never a raw outcome such as monthly backlinks.
- What it measures.
- The current baseline.
- The 90-day target, a specific number or percentage, never "more".
- The trigger threshold below which the system needs intervention.

Then add a one-line bottom line naming the leading-indicator metric for my stage, and a reporting cadence with intervention triggers, including the rule that if link volume rises while process metrics stay flat, I am chasing cheap citations.

As you build it:
- Output exactly 5 metrics, each with a specific 90-day target and trigger threshold.
- Draw the metrics from media-list size, warm-contact ratio, data-asset organic traffic, reclamation conversion rate, and source-direct contact rate.

My details: [Insert your current media-list size, your current percentage of warm contacts, the monthly organic traffic to your top data-asset page, and the percentage of placements from direct journalist emails.]

Measurement and Improvement

Build the Placement-to-Revenue Attribution Map

Maps earned placements to referral sessions, single-session and assisted conversions, and attributed revenue with cost per acquisition.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as an SEO measurement analyst who has built attribution models linking earned placements to multi-touch revenue. Single-session attribution underrates link work, since most B2B conversions happen on a later touch. Build my placement-to-revenue attribution map. Give me a table with these…

View prompt

Act as an SEO measurement analyst who has built attribution models linking earned placements to multi-touch revenue. Single-session attribution underrates link work, since most B2B conversions happen on a later touch.

Build my placement-to-revenue attribution map. Give me a table with these columns:

- Placement, with publication and date.
- Referral sessions in the last 90 days.
- Single-session conversions, and assisted multi-touch conversions, in separate columns.
- Total attributed revenue, and cost per acquisition for that placement against a paid-media baseline.

Then add the total attributed revenue, the number of placements with zero attributed revenue, the top three revenue-driving placements with one sentence each, pattern observations on the best-converting publication type and format, and a one-line bottom line naming the placement type to chase more of.

As you build it:
- Calculate every revenue figure from my data; do not estimate.
- Keep single-session and assisted conversions separate; do not merge them.
- If my analytics cannot show assisted conversions, say so plainly and report single-session only.

My details: [Insert your placements over the last 90-plus days with publication, URL, date, and topic, your referral traffic data, your average customer lifetime value, and your sales-cycle length.]

Productivity

Build My Backlink Flywheel Weekly Schedule

Builds a sustainable weekly link-building schedule across four rhythms with time caps, success measures, and monthly time totals.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a digital PR operations consultant who has built sustainable weekly link-building schedules. A steady rhythm beats a heroic sprint, which collapses during its recovery period. Build my full weekly schedule across four rhythms: a daily media sweep, a weekly asset-integration…

View prompt

Act as a digital PR operations consultant who has built sustainable weekly link-building schedules. A steady rhythm beats a heroic sprint, which collapses during its recovery period.

Build my full weekly schedule across four rhythms: a daily media sweep, a weekly asset-integration block, a monthly reclamation audit, and a quarterly relationship review, fitted into the weekly hours I give you. For each of the four rhythms, give me:
● The specific actions in that block.
● A time cap, keeping any daily block at 30 minutes or less.
● A specific success measure, expressed as a count or an artifact, never "make progress".

Then close with:
● A monthly total of allocated time, broken down by rhythm, checked against the hours I give you.
● If I have fewer than 10 hours a month, prioritise the daily sweep and monthly audit and drop the weekly asset block to every two weeks.

My details: [Insert your weekly hours for link-building, your current SEO and marketing commitments, the weekday you prefer for the weekly asset block, and the day of the month for the reclamation block.]

SEO & Content

Set the Monthly Reclamation Audit Checklist

Produces a repeatable three-hour monthly broken-link reclamation audit checklist with discovery, vetting, and outreach blocks.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a broken-link reclamation operations specialist who has run monthly audits across more than 30 profiles. The power is in repeatability: the same sequence every month so the loop compounds. Produce a copy-and-paste monthly reclamation audit checklist I run in a…

View prompt

Act as a broken-link reclamation operations specialist who has run monthly audits across more than 30 profiles. The power is in repeatability: the same sequence every month so the loop compounds.

Produce a copy-and-paste monthly reclamation audit checklist I run in a single three-hour block on the first day of the month. Lay it out as three hour-long blocks:
● Hour 1, prospect discovery: open the broken-backlinks report for each of three competitors, apply the filters, and export the top prospects into one consolidated list.
● Hour 2, vetting and replacement specs: run the four-step vetting on the list, spec a one-to-one replacement for each Go prospect, and decide which assets the team builds this month.
● Hour 3, outreach: send a value-first email for each Go prospect that already has a published replacement, capped at 5 emails a day, and schedule one polite follow-up.
● An end-of-block deliverable: at least 10 vetted Go prospects, at least 5 outreach emails sent or queued, a build list for the content team, and follow-ups scheduled.

As you write it:
● Keep the total time box at exactly three hours, with every checklist item one concrete action.
● Do not recommend sending more than 5 outreach emails a day.

My details: [Insert your three competitor domains, your SEO tool, and the CRM or spreadsheet where you track outreach.]

Marketing

Plan the Quarterly Relationship Review

Plans a quarterly journalist relationship review with three tiers, specific value-drops, and a single priority relationship.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a digital PR account director whose quarterly relationship reviews produced two to three times growth in warm-source placements. The review is two hours of relationship hygiene, not a campaign. Plan my next quarterly relationship review: which journalists to contact, the…

View prompt

Act as a digital PR account director whose quarterly relationship reviews produced two to three times growth in warm-source placements. The review is two hours of relationship hygiene, not a campaign.

Plan my next quarterly relationship review: which journalists to contact, the value to send each, and the cadence. Give me three tiers and a bottom line:
● Tier 1, relationships that placed your data in the last 6 months: a table with journalist, publication, last placement, the specific value-drop to send this quarter, and the target send week.
● Tier 2, warm relationships from 6 to 12 months ago: a table with journalist, publication, last placement, a specific re-warming move, and the target send week.
● Tier 3, at-risk relationships from 12 or more months ago: a table with journalist, publication, last placement, a decision of Reconnect or Archive, and the reason.
● A close with total touches planned, a warm-versus-cold ratio target, and a one-line bottom line naming the single relationship to invest in most.

As you write it:
● Give every Tier 1 entry a specific value-drop, never a generic check-in.
● Ke

Better prompts.Better starting points.

Better prompts.
Better starting points.