THE PROMPT LIBRARY

Better prompts.
Better starting points.

Find a clear starting point for your next task. Search, make it yours, and open it in ChatGPT.

1,341 prompts

Ready to make your own

Email Marketing Strategy

Write a Value-First Broken-Link Outreach Email

Writes a concise value-first broken-link outreach email with precise link location details and a casual replacement suggestion.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a broken-link reclamation copywriter whose value-first outreach converts above 20%, against about 2% for generic broken-link emails. The pitch should feel like an unsolicited free audit. Write a value-first broken-link outreach email that surfaces the broken link with exact location…

View prompt

Act as a broken-link reclamation copywriter whose value-first outreach converts above 20%, against about 2% for generic broken-link emails. The pitch should feel like an unsolicited free audit.

Write a value-first broken-link outreach email that surfaces the broken link with exact location details, then suggests my one-to-one-matched replacement. Give me all of this:
● A subject line of 10 words or fewer referencing the broken link or page topic, not my company.
● An email body of 130 words or fewer: an opener noting you were reading their page and spotted something broken, a broken-link callout with the exact location of URL, paragraph number, anchor text, and dead URL, a casual no-pressure replacement suggestion naming the asset and URL, and a short close.
● The body word count.

As you write it:
● Make the callout precise enough that the webmaster can find the link in under 30 seconds.
● Frame the replacement casually, with phrases like "if it's useful" and "no pressure".
● Keep the body to 130 words or fewer, and do not use "I would love" or "I would be grateful".

My details: [Insert the target referring page URL, the broken-link location of paragraph number and anchor text, the dead URL, your replacement asset's URL and name, and the webmaster's first name if known.]

Local SEO Optimization

Pitch a Local or Niche Resource Page for Inclusion

Crafts a short resource-page inclusion pitch that references a specific existing entry and names a concrete gap your asset fills.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a localised SEO outreach specialist who has secured placements on local and niche resource pages. Inclusion is editorial, so the pitch must show you read the curator's list. Write a resource-page inclusion pitch that positions my asset as a fit…

View prompt

Act as a localised SEO outreach specialist who has secured placements on local and niche resource pages. Inclusion is editorial, so the pitch must show you read the curator's list.

Write a resource-page inclusion pitch that positions my asset as a fit for the curator's existing list. Give me all of this:
● A subject line of 10 words or fewer referencing the specific resource page topic.
● An email body of 120 words or fewer: an opener naming the resource page and one specific entry already on it, a gap statement naming what my asset adds that current entries miss, a one-sentence asset description, and a no-pressure close.
● The body word count.

As you write it:
● Make the opener reference one specific existing entry, not "your great list of resources".
● Make the gap statement name something concrete that is missing, such as a calculation, dataset, or region.
● Keep the body to 120 words or fewer, and do not use "I think we'd be a great fit".

My details: [Insert the resource page URL, the curator's name if known, one specific existing entry to reference, your asset's URL, and its community-utility angle.]

SEO & Content

Vet a Dead-Resource Prospect Against the 4-Step Checklist

Screen broken-link prospects with a four-step trust checklist and Go/No-Go verdicts.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a broken-link reclamation auditor who has documented the conversion gap between vetted and unvetted outreach. A broken link on a toxic site is not worth reclaiming. Vet each prospect on my broken-link list against the four-step trust checklist. Give me…

View prompt

Act as a broken-link reclamation auditor who has documented the conversion gap between vetted and unvetted outreach. A broken link on a toxic site is not worth reclaiming.
Vet each prospect on my broken-link list against the four-step trust checklist. Give me a table with these columns:
● Referring domain and dead competitor URL.
● Step 1, the 404 is confirmed, yes or no.
● Step 2, the referring page has acceptable traffic and topical alignment, yes or no.
● Step 3, the original content has been reviewed on the Wayback Machine, yes or no.
● Step 4, the link context has been evaluated, yes or no.
● Verdict of Go or No-Go, and a reason in 20 words or fewer naming the step number.
As you build it:
● Mark a prospect Go only when all four steps pass; any single failure means No-Go.
● Do not mark a prospect Go on link count alone.
● If the Wayback Machine cannot retrieve the original content, mark Step 3 no and the verdict No-Go.
● After the table, give the totals vetted, Go, and No-Go.
My details: [Insert the prospect list from Prompt 19, each row with the referring domain, dead competitor URL, inbound-links count, and anchor patterns, plus any Wayback notes or traffic data.]

SEO & Content

Apply the 1:1 Match Rule to Spec the Replacement Asset

Specs a one-to-one replacement asset for each Go prospect, including scope, upgrade limits, build time, and a Build or Defer decision.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a content strategist who has applied the one-to-one match rule and raised reclamation conversion from around 2% to above 20%. The replacement must match the dead page's job, not just its topic. For each Go prospect from Prompt 20, spec…

View prompt

Act as a content strategist who has applied the one-to-one match rule and raised reclamation conversion from around 2% to above 20%. The replacement must match the dead page's job, not just its topic.

For each Go prospect from Prompt 20, spec the replacement asset that matches the dead page's promise in scope, depth, and format. For each prospect, give me all of this:
● The original asset format, such as calculator, dataset, guide, or statistic.
● The original promise, one sentence, extracted from the Wayback Machine version.
● The one-to-one match scope: what the replacement must deliver at the same scope and depth.
● The acceptable upgrade that does not break the match, plus the forbidden divergences of no topic change, no broadened scope, and no shift from utility to opinion.
● An honest build-time estimate in hours, a URL-slug recommendation, and a decision of Build or Defer.

As you write it:
● Make every replacement a one-to-one match in format and scope; no loosely related replacements.
● Keep the acceptable upgrade about how well or how recently the asset works, not what it does.
● Make the decision Build or Defer, never "investigate further".

My details: [Insert each Go-verdict prospect with its dead URL, a Wayback Machine summary of what the dead page was, and your content team's capacity for the next 30 days.]

Marketing

Convert a Placement Into a Zero-Drag Source Relationship

Build a three-message sequence that turns a one-time citation into a recurring source relationship.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a digital PR relationship strategist who turns one-off placements into recurring sources. The goal is a journalist who emails you directly for the next quote instead of using a query platform. Write the three-message post-placement sequence that converts a journalist…

View prompt

Act as a digital PR relationship strategist who turns one-off placements into recurring sources. The goal is a journalist who emails you directly for the next quote instead of using a query platform.
Write the three-message post-placement sequence that converts a journalist who cited me once into a recurring source, with no message asking for a second link. Give me three messages:
● Message 1, within 24 hours of publication, 60 words or fewer: thank them for the inclusion, name how they framed the data, and mention you shared and tagged the article. No ask.
● Message 2, about 30 days later, 80 words or fewer: a brief observation tied to a real update in their beat, or a new exclusive data point, with a one-sentence offer of more. No ask.
● Message 3, about 60 days later, 80 words or fewer: reference a recent article of theirs, share one observation or data point, and sign off as an always-available source. No ask.
As you write them:
● No message asks for a link, placement, or favour, and every message references something specific.
● Do not open with "Just wanted to follow up" or "Checking in".
● Put my title and direct email in every signature.
My details: [Insert the journalist's name and publication, the article that cited you and its publication date, and one or two data points you could share over the next 60 days.]

SEO & Content

Discover Broken-Backlink Prospects on a Competitor's Domain

Run a broken-backlink discovery workflow on a competitor's domain with filters and a prospect list.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a broken-link prospecting specialist who has converted more than 100 reclamation prospects a quarter. The play targets a competitor's 404 pages that still have inbound links. Walk me through the workflow to discover broken-backlink prospects on a specific competitor's domain.…

View prompt

Act as a broken-link prospecting specialist who has converted more than 100 reclamation prospects a quarter. The play targets a competitor's 404 pages that still have inbound links.
Walk me through the workflow to discover broken-backlink prospects on a specific competitor's domain. Give me the answer in three parts:
● A numbered workflow, each step 30 words or fewer, naming the exact menu path in my SEO tool to pull the competitor's broken-backlink or 404 report, filter to 404s, sort by referring domains, and export the top rows.
● A filter-criteria table with columns filter, threshold, and reason, using specific numeric thresholds for referring domains to the dead URL, topical relevance, linking-page traffic, and anchor-text quality.
● The prospect-list shape, naming the columns: dead competitor URL, inbound-links count, top three referring domains, topical fit, anchor patterns, and whether a replacement asset exists.
As you write it:
● Reference my SEO tool by name; do not recommend tools I did not name.
● Make every filter threshold a specific number, not "high" or "moderate".
● End with a realistic estimate of how many prospects survive filtering, typically 10% to 40% of raw results.
My details: [Insert the competitor domain, the SEO tool you have access to such as Ahrefs, Semrush, or Moz, and your industry or topical focus.]

Marketing

Write a No-Link-Needed Payload Email

Pitch a tier-1 editor with a free data payload that explicitly requires no link.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a digital PR strategist who has documented that pitches stating "no link required" out-earn direct link-asks. Asking for nothing slips the pitch past the editor's defensive screening. Write a payload email to a tier-1 publisher that hands the editor a…

View prompt

Act as a digital PR strategist who has documented that pitches stating "no link required" out-earn direct link-asks. Asking for nothing slips the pitch past the editor's defensive screening.
Write a payload email to a tier-1 publisher that hands the editor a free dataset, data point, or quote and explicitly states "no link required". Give me all of this:
● A subject line of 10 words or fewer in news-headline style, naming the data and the audience need.
● An email body of 90 words or fewer with three sentences: a context line proving you know the editor's beat, a payload line delivering the data and audience need that ends with "no link required", and a friction-free offer of the raw dataset, the summary, or an interview.
● A "why this works" note of 30 words or fewer explaining the mechanism.
As you write it:
● Use the phrase "no link required" verbatim in the payload sentence, and keep the body to 90 words or fewer.
● Mention my company once at most, in the signature.
● Do not add a call to action, and do not use "We thought you might be interested".
My details: [Insert the editor's name, their publication and beat, your payload of the specific data and headline statistic, and the audience need driving urgency this week.]

Email Marketing Strategy

Draft a Winning Journalist-Query Response

Drafts a concise journalist-query response that answers first and includes a paste-ready quote block.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a digital PR specialist who has converted journalist-query responses into tier-1 placements. You win by answering the exact question first and pre-writing the quote the journalist can paste. Draft a winning response to a specific journalist's source query. Give me…

View prompt

Act as a digital PR specialist who has converted journalist-query responses into tier-1 placements. You win by answering the exact question first and pre-writing the quote the journalist can paste.

Draft a winning response to a specific journalist's source query. Give me a response body of 150 words or fewer, in this order:
● A first sentence, 20 to 30 words, directly answering the question with a clear position or data point.
● A second sentence, 30 to 45 words, with the supporting data or insight, naming the specific number, time window, or source.
● A pre-written quote block of 50 words or fewer, set off for verbatim copying, in the first person with the full name and title in the attribution.
● A closing sentence offering an interview or the underlying dataset.

As you write it:
● Make the first sentence answer the question, not introduce me or my company.
● Keep the whole response to 150 words or fewer and the quote to 50 words or fewer.
● Do not use "I would be happy to chat" or "Feel free to reach out".
● Do not add marketing language beyond the title in the attribution.

My details: [Insert the journalist's query text or a summary, the publication, your angle on the question, and the number or insight the quote should anchor on.]

Marketing

Plan a Polite 48-Hour Follow-Up

Write a single respectful 48-hour follow-up email with timing and subject-line rules.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a digital PR operations specialist who has documented follow-up cadences. One follow-up can double conversion; a second burns the relationship and can get you flagged in shared media databases. Draft a single polite follow-up I can send 48 hours after…

View prompt

Act as a digital PR operations specialist who has documented follow-up cadences. One follow-up can double conversion; a second burns the relationship and can get you flagged in shared media databases.
Draft a single polite follow-up I can send 48 hours after my original pitch, with the hard ceiling at one nudge. Give me all of this:
● A follow-up email of 70 words or fewer with three parts: a one-sentence reference to the original pitch's topic, a one-sentence line assuming the journalist is busy and bumping for visibility, and a one-sentence graceful exit stating plainly that you will not message again.
● The send-timing rule: send exactly 48 hours after the original, send no second follow-up, and if there is still silence mark the prospect "no response" and rotate to another journalist.
● The subject-line instruction: reply on the original thread with "Re: [original subject]" and do not change the subject line.
As you write it:
● Keep the email to 70 words or fewer.
● Do not use "Just following up", "Just checking in", or "Circling back".
● Do not add a second offer of value; that reads as escalation, not respect.
My details: [Insert the body of your original pitch, the journalist's name, and the date you sent the original.]

Marketing

Build a Journalist Beat-Map for My Data Asset

Builds a 15-row journalist beat-map with proving articles and pitch angles, then ranks the top five pitch-first candidates.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a digital PR strategist who has built journalist beat-maps with response rates above 25%. A targeted map of 15 journalists who covered your exact topic recently beats a generic list of 200 names. Identify exactly 15 journalists whose recent coverage…

View prompt

Act as a digital PR strategist who has built journalist beat-maps with response rates above 25%. A targeted map of 15 journalists who covered your exact topic recently beats a generic list of 200 names.

Identify exactly 15 journalists whose recent coverage lines up directly with my data asset. Give me a table with exactly 15 rows and these columns:
● Journalist name and publication.
● A recent proving article, with title and approximate date, that shows the beat fit.
● Their angle or beat, in 20 words or fewer.
● The angle most likely to land with that journalist, in 25 words or fewer.

As you build it:
● Output exactly 15 journalists, not 10 and not 20.
● Give every journalist a proving article; if you cannot verify one, write "Verify: search [journalist name], [publication], [topic]" in that cell.
● Do not include off-topic beats or PR-distribution-service contacts.
● After the table, rank the top five pitch-first candidates, each with a reason tied to a recent article or beat shift.

My details: [Insert your data asset's topic and findings, your industry vertical, the geographic markets you serve, and any journalists who have already cited you.]

Better prompts.Better starting points.

Better prompts.
Better starting points.