THE PROMPT LIBRARY

Better prompts.
Better starting points.

Find a clear starting point for your next task. Search, make it yours, and open it in ChatGPT.

126 prompts

Ready to make your own

SEO & Content

Intent Signal Decoder

Classify keywords by search intent and get the optimal content format and structure for each.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a search intent analyst. For these keywords [list 5-10 keywords], classify each according to their primary intent (informational, navigational, commercial, transactional) and any secondary intent signals. Explain your reasoning based on query modifiers, competing content types, and SERP features. Then…

View prompt

Act as a search intent analyst. For these keywords [list 5-10 keywords], classify each according to their primary intent (informational, navigational, commercial, transactional) and any secondary intent signals. Explain your reasoning based on query modifiers, competing content types, and SERP features. Then recommend the optimal content format and structure for each keyword to match these intent signals.

SEO & Content

SERP Emotional Subtext Analysis

Uncover the emotional triggers behind top-ranking results and differentiate your content on the same drivers.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Function as a consumer psychologist specializing in search behavior. Analyze the emotional subtext in these top-ranking results for [keyword]: [paste titles of top 5 results]. Identify which emotional triggers they're targeting (fear, aspiration, curiosity, urgency, etc.). Then suggest how my content could…

View prompt

Function as a consumer psychologist specializing in search behavior. Analyze the emotional subtext in these top-ranking results for [keyword]: [paste titles of top 5 results]. Identify which emotional triggers they're targeting (fear, aspiration, curiosity, urgency, etc.). Then suggest how my content could address the same emotional drivers while differentiating from these approaches based on my brand's unique perspective of [briefly describe your brand positioning].

SEO & Content

SERP Feature Analysis

Decode SERP features for target keywords to reveal user intent and visibility opportunities.

PROMPT PREVIEW

As an SEO specialist, analyze the SERP features for these keywords: [list 3-5 related keywords]. For each keyword, identify: 1) The dominant SERP features (featured snippets, PAA boxes, knowledge panels, etc.), 2) What these features reveal about user intent, 3) The content…

View prompt

As an SEO specialist, analyze the SERP features for these keywords: [list 3-5 related keywords]. For each keyword, identify: 1) The dominant SERP features (featured snippets, PAA boxes, knowledge panels, etc.), 2) What these features reveal about user intent, 3) The content formats that appear to perform best, and 4) Opportunities for my content to capture visibility based on these observations.

SEO & Content

Design a Co-Authored Research Partnership

Structures a co-authored research partnership with non-competing brands, including methodology, schedule, and attribution rules.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a partnership strategist who has structured co-authored research between non-competing brands that doubled each asset's link economics. Partners must share the audience without competing on the same product. Design a co-authored research partnership with an adjacent, non-competing brand. Give me…

View prompt

Act as a partnership strategist who has structured co-authored research between non-competing brands that doubled each asset's link economics. Partners must share the audience without competing on the same product.

Design a co-authored research partnership with an adjacent, non-competing brand. Give me all of this:
● Partner identification: three recommended partner types, each with two or three named brand examples I could approach.
● The research shape: the joint topic, the data each partner contributes, and the combined insight neither could produce alone.
● A methodology agreement to lock in writing before data collection: sample size, collection method, collection window, and anonymisation rules.
● A publication schedule with a joint draft-review date, a joint publication date, and an embargo policy.
● Attribution rules covering authorship, where each brand publishes, the reciprocal backlink agreement, and social attribution.
● Contract checkpoints to lock before kickoff, and a one-line risk warning about verbal agreements between marketing teams.

As you write it:
● Recommend only non-competing partners that share the audience but sell a different product.
● Require the methodology to be locked in writing before any data is collected.
● Do not skip the contract checkpoints.

My details: [Insert your industry and product, your target customer profile, three to five adjacent non-competing brands you could approach, and your team's capacity for co-research work.]

SEO & Content

Run Statistical Source Arbitrage on a Stale Statistic

Plans a campaign to replace a stale, still-cited industry statistic with fresh data and displace the original citation.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a digital PR strategist who has run statistical source arbitrage: replacing a stale, still-cited industry statistic with current data and displacing the original citation. Identify my best statistical source arbitrage opportunity and plan the campaign to displace the citation. Give…

View prompt

Act as a digital PR strategist who has run statistical source arbitrage: replacing a stale, still-cited industry statistic with current data and displacing the original citation.

Identify my best statistical source arbitrage opportunity and plan the campaign to displace the citation. Give me the answer in four parts:
● The stale statistic: the exact figure, the original source and year, the year the data was collected, its current age in years, and a sample count of articles still citing it.
● A replication plan: the methodology to replicate with matching sample size, screening, and question wording, the survey platform, an estimated cost at or below $500, and a timeline in weeks.
● A publication plan: the landing-page format, a suggested URL slug, the updated headline statistic, and a press-ready summary.
● An outreach plan: a target count of writers who cited the original, an outreach email of 80 words or fewer, and the expected conversion.

As you write it:
● Use a statistic at least three years old; do not run this play on one under two years old.
● Match the original methodology exactly: same sample size, same screening, same question.
● Keep the total cost under $500 and the outreach email at 80 words or fewer.

My details: [Insert your industry, two or three statistics you have seen cited repeatedly that you suspect are stale, the original sources if known, and your survey budget cap.]

SEO & Content

Prompt 35: Set Up an Unlinked Brand Mention Recovery System

Sets up a complete unlinked brand-mention recovery system with alerts, outreach template, cadence, and conversion benchmarks.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a brand-monitoring specialist whose unlinked brand-mention recovery systems convert mentions to links above 40%. Every week someone writes about your company without adding a link, and backlink tools miss most of them. Set up my full unlinked brand-mention recovery system.…

View prompt

Act as a brand-monitoring specialist whose unlinked brand-mention recovery systems convert mentions to links above 40%. Every week someone writes about your company without adding a link, and backlink tools miss most of them.
Set up my full unlinked brand-mention recovery system. Give me all of this:
● An alert configuration of exactly 4 free alerts for the brand name, founder name, product name, and a proprietary term, each in quotes and set to as-it-happens, plus one paid monitoring tool with a monthly cost and keywords to track.
● An outreach template of 70 words or fewer that thanks the writer for the mention and asks, without pressure, whether they would link it.
● A weekly review cadence: a block of 30 minutes or less, the review action, an outreach cap of 10 emails a week, and one polite follow-up at most.
● The expected conversion: roughly 40% convert after one outreach, about 10% after a follow-up, and the rest never convert.
As you write it:
● Output exactly 4 free alert configurations, and keep the outreach template at 70 words or fewer.
● Do not use "I would be grateful" or "Would you mind".
● Do not recommend more than 10 outreach emails a week.
My details: [Insert your brand name, founder name or names, product name or names, any proprietary terms you have coined, and your monthly budget for paid monitoring, or "free only".]

SEO & Content

Prompt 36: Spec a Single-Purpose Free Tool That Wins Citations

Specs a narrow single-purpose free tool with user flow, methodology page, build estimate, and citation forecast.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a product strategist who has specced single-purpose free tools that earn hundreds of citations a year. The tools that scale each do one job well and rank for a narrow query. Spec a single-purpose free tool for my industry, narrow…

View prompt

Act as a product strategist who has specced single-purpose free tools that earn hundreds of citations a year. The tools that scale each do one job well and rank for a narrow query.
Spec a single-purpose free tool for my industry, narrow enough to dominate a niche query, with a transparent methodology page. Give me all of this:
● The concept: the tool name, the single job it does in one sentence, the niche query it targets, and why a narrow scope wins.
● A user flow of 5 steps or fewer, and an output specification covering format, copy-paste readiness, and any visual element.
● A methodology page outline of 300 to 500 words covering data sources, assumptions, known limitations, and the last data-update date.
● A build estimate split into frontend, backend, and methodology copy, with a build approach of no-code, low-code, or custom, and both an internal-hours and an outsourced-cost figure.
● A launch strategy and an expected citation volume for Year 1 and beyond.
As you write it:
● Keep the single-job description to one sentence; if it needs two, narrow the tool further.
● Make the output copy-paste cleanly into an article as a number, recommendation, or short paragraph.
● Do not spec a tool needing proprietary algorithms I do not own; treat the methodology page as required.
My details: [Insert your industry or niche, a recurring calculation or decision your audience makes, your technical capacity such as in-house developer, no-code only, or able to outsource, and your build budget.]

SEO & Content

Prompt 34: Plan a Wikipedia Citation Reclamation Campaign

Plans a compliant Wikipedia citation reclamation campaign with target articles, a Talk-page template, and etiquette rules.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a Wikipedia citation strategist who has secured citations without triggering conflict-of-interest reverts. The campaign works only when proposals are made on the article's Talk page with a genuinely better source. Plan my Wikipedia citation reclamation campaign. Give me the answer…

View prompt

Act as a Wikipedia citation strategist who has secured citations without triggering conflict-of-interest reverts. The campaign works only when proposals are made on the article's Talk page with a genuinely better source.
Plan my Wikipedia citation reclamation campaign. Give me the answer in three parts:
● A table of 5 to 10 target articles, each with the article title, URL, the specific dead-link or citation-needed tag location, the asset of mine that would replace it, and why it is a one-to-one match in 25 words or fewer.
● A Talk-page proposal template of 200 words or fewer that names the claim, notes the broken citation, proposes my source with a one-sentence methodology note, and leaves the final decision to editors.
● The non-negotiable etiquette rules: propose on the Talk page only, disclose any conflict of interest, propose no more than one citation per article per month, keep brand promotion out of the proposal, and accept a revert without re-submitting.
As you write it:
● Recommend only articles where I have a genuinely fitting existing asset; do not suggest manufacturing assets for Wikipedia.
● Make sure every target article has a verified dead-link or citation-needed tag.
My details: [Insert your industry or topic domain, the data assets you have published with URLs and short descriptions, and any Wikipedia articles you suspect have dead citations. If you have no targets yet, paste your industry and assets.]

SEO & Content

Compare Earned vs. Bought Strategies Side-by-Side

Delivers a board-ready risk and ROI comparison of earned versus bought links with talking points for stakeholder pushback.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as an SEO risk analyst who has documented the differences between earned and bought link strategies across Google core updates. The comparison must hold up in a board meeting. Produce a side-by-side comparison of earned-authority and bought-link strategies, tailored to my…

View prompt

Act as an SEO risk analyst who has documented the differences between earned and bought link strategies across Google core updates. The comparison must hold up in a board meeting.

Produce a side-by-side comparison of earned-authority and bought-link strategies, tailored to my context, that I can use to push back on link-buying shortcuts. Give me a comparison table with one row per criterion and a column for each strategy, covering:

- Year 1 initial cost, and Year 2-and-beyond ongoing cost.
- Time to first measurable result, and compounding behaviour over time.
- Algorithm-update risk, and brand-reputation risk.
- Discoverability if audited, 12-month ROI, 36-month ROI, and recovery cost if penalised.

Then add three business-language talking points for stakeholder pushback, each one expanded sentence, and a one-line bottom line I could say verbatim in a budget meeting.

As you write it:
- Fill every cell with a specific value or descriptive range; leave nothing blank.
- Keep the talking points in business language, not SEO jargon.
- Frame the comparison in risk and ROI terms; do not moralise about white hat versus black hat.

My details: [Insert the stakeholder pressure you face, such as a request to buy links at a set price, plus your domain size, competitive vertical, and recent algorithm updates affecting your space.]

SEO & Content

Prompt 31: Compare Earned vs. Bought Strategies Side-by-Side

Builds a board-ready earned-versus-bought link comparison table with ROI, risk, and stakeholder talking points.

PROMPT PREVIEW

View prompt

Act as an SEO risk analyst who has documented the differences between earned and bought link strategies across Google core updates. The comparison must hold up in a board meeting. Produce a side-by-side comparison of earned-authority and bought-link strategies, tailored to my context, that I can use to push back on link-buying shortcuts. Give me a comparison table with one row per criterion and a column for each strategy, covering:
● Year 1 initial cost, and Year 2-and-beyond ongoing cost.
● Time to first measurable result, and compounding behaviour over time.
● Algorithm-update risk, and brand-reputation risk.
● Discoverability if audited, 12-month ROI, 36-month ROI, and recovery cost if penalised.
Then add three business-language talking points for stakeholder pushback, each one expanded sentence, and a one-line bottom line I could say verbatim in a budget meeting.
As you write it:
● Fill every cell with a specific value or descriptive range; leave nothing blank.
● Keep the talking points in business language, not SEO jargon.
● Frame the comparison in risk and ROI terms; do not moralise about white hat versus black hat.
My details: [Insert the stakeholder pressure you face, such as a request to buy links at a set price, plus your domain size, competitive vertical, and recent algorithm updates affecting your space.]

Better prompts.Better starting points.

Better prompts.
Better starting points.