THE PROMPT LIBRARY

SEO & Content
prompts.

Find a clear starting point for your next task. Search, make it yours, and open it in ChatGPT.

126 prompts

Ready to make your own

SEO & Content

Set Realistic Ranking Timeline Expectations

Creates a stakeholder memo with four timeline intervals explaining what to expect and what not to read as failure during a link campaign.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as an SEO strategist who has briefed stakeholders on realistic link-building timelines. Stakeholders panic in week 4 if they were never briefed, and that is when good strategies get killed. Draft the timeline-expectations memo I send to stakeholders before the campaign…

View prompt

Act as an SEO strategist who has briefed stakeholders on realistic link-building timelines. Stakeholders panic in week 4 if they were never briefed, and that is when good strategies get killed.

Draft the timeline-expectations memo I send to stakeholders before the campaign starts. Give me a memo with these parts:

- A short version stating that new backlinks typically take around 10 weeks to show noticeable ranking effects and that full impact accumulates over 3 to 12 months.
- Four interval sections, covering weeks 1 to 4, 5 to 10, 11 to 26, and 27 to 52, each naming what is happening, what stakeholders will see, and what they should not read as failure.
- A closing "what this is not" note: this is not performance marketing, and killing the strategy in week 6 wastes everything invested before week 11.

As you write it:
- Keep all timeline numbers consistent with a 10-week baseline and a 3-to-12-month full-impact window.
- Do not promise specific ranking positions or traffic percentages.
- Give every interval explicit guidance on what not to read as failure.
- Cite specific algorithm behaviour such as re-crawl windows; avoid vague reassurance like "patience pays off".

My details: [Insert your stakeholder and their SEO sophistication, your campaign start date, your current organic traffic baseline, and the target keywords or pages you want to lift.]

SEO & Content

Set the Monthly Reclamation Audit Checklist

Produces a repeatable three-hour monthly broken-link reclamation audit checklist with discovery, vetting, and outreach blocks.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a broken-link reclamation operations specialist who has run monthly audits across more than 30 profiles. The power is in repeatability: the same sequence every month so the loop compounds. Produce a copy-and-paste monthly reclamation audit checklist I run in a…

View prompt

Act as a broken-link reclamation operations specialist who has run monthly audits across more than 30 profiles. The power is in repeatability: the same sequence every month so the loop compounds.

Produce a copy-and-paste monthly reclamation audit checklist I run in a single three-hour block on the first day of the month. Lay it out as three hour-long blocks:
● Hour 1, prospect discovery: open the broken-backlinks report for each of three competitors, apply the filters, and export the top prospects into one consolidated list.
● Hour 2, vetting and replacement specs: run the four-step vetting on the list, spec a one-to-one replacement for each Go prospect, and decide which assets the team builds this month.
● Hour 3, outreach: send a value-first email for each Go prospect that already has a published replacement, capped at 5 emails a day, and schedule one polite follow-up.
● An end-of-block deliverable: at least 10 vetted Go prospects, at least 5 outreach emails sent or queued, a build list for the content team, and follow-ups scheduled.

As you write it:
● Keep the total time box at exactly three hours, with every checklist item one concrete action.
● Do not recommend sending more than 5 outreach emails a day.

My details: [Insert your three competitor domains, your SEO tool, and the CRM or spreadsheet where you track outreach.]

SEO & Content

Vet a Dead-Resource Prospect Against the 4-Step Checklist

Screen broken-link prospects with a four-step trust checklist and Go/No-Go verdicts.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a broken-link reclamation auditor who has documented the conversion gap between vetted and unvetted outreach. A broken link on a toxic site is not worth reclaiming. Vet each prospect on my broken-link list against the four-step trust checklist. Give me…

View prompt

Act as a broken-link reclamation auditor who has documented the conversion gap between vetted and unvetted outreach. A broken link on a toxic site is not worth reclaiming.
Vet each prospect on my broken-link list against the four-step trust checklist. Give me a table with these columns:
● Referring domain and dead competitor URL.
● Step 1, the 404 is confirmed, yes or no.
● Step 2, the referring page has acceptable traffic and topical alignment, yes or no.
● Step 3, the original content has been reviewed on the Wayback Machine, yes or no.
● Step 4, the link context has been evaluated, yes or no.
● Verdict of Go or No-Go, and a reason in 20 words or fewer naming the step number.
As you build it:
● Mark a prospect Go only when all four steps pass; any single failure means No-Go.
● Do not mark a prospect Go on link count alone.
● If the Wayback Machine cannot retrieve the original content, mark Step 3 no and the verdict No-Go.
● After the table, give the totals vetted, Go, and No-Go.
My details: [Insert the prospect list from Prompt 19, each row with the referring domain, dead competitor URL, inbound-links count, and anchor patterns, plus any Wayback notes or traffic data.]

SEO & Content

Apply the 1:1 Match Rule to Spec the Replacement Asset

Specs a one-to-one replacement asset for each Go prospect, including scope, upgrade limits, build time, and a Build or Defer decision.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a content strategist who has applied the one-to-one match rule and raised reclamation conversion from around 2% to above 20%. The replacement must match the dead page's job, not just its topic. For each Go prospect from Prompt 20, spec…

View prompt

Act as a content strategist who has applied the one-to-one match rule and raised reclamation conversion from around 2% to above 20%. The replacement must match the dead page's job, not just its topic.

For each Go prospect from Prompt 20, spec the replacement asset that matches the dead page's promise in scope, depth, and format. For each prospect, give me all of this:
● The original asset format, such as calculator, dataset, guide, or statistic.
● The original promise, one sentence, extracted from the Wayback Machine version.
● The one-to-one match scope: what the replacement must deliver at the same scope and depth.
● The acceptable upgrade that does not break the match, plus the forbidden divergences of no topic change, no broadened scope, and no shift from utility to opinion.
● An honest build-time estimate in hours, a URL-slug recommendation, and a decision of Build or Defer.

As you write it:
● Make every replacement a one-to-one match in format and scope; no loosely related replacements.
● Keep the acceptable upgrade about how well or how recently the asset works, not what it does.
● Make the decision Build or Defer, never "investigate further".

My details: [Insert each Go-verdict prospect with its dead URL, a Wayback Machine summary of what the dead page was, and your content team's capacity for the next 30 days.]

SEO & Content

Discover Broken-Backlink Prospects on a Competitor's Domain

Run a broken-backlink discovery workflow on a competitor's domain with filters and a prospect list.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a broken-link prospecting specialist who has converted more than 100 reclamation prospects a quarter. The play targets a competitor's 404 pages that still have inbound links. Walk me through the workflow to discover broken-backlink prospects on a specific competitor's domain.…

View prompt

Act as a broken-link prospecting specialist who has converted more than 100 reclamation prospects a quarter. The play targets a competitor's 404 pages that still have inbound links.
Walk me through the workflow to discover broken-backlink prospects on a specific competitor's domain. Give me the answer in three parts:
● A numbered workflow, each step 30 words or fewer, naming the exact menu path in my SEO tool to pull the competitor's broken-backlink or 404 report, filter to 404s, sort by referring domains, and export the top rows.
● A filter-criteria table with columns filter, threshold, and reason, using specific numeric thresholds for referring domains to the dead URL, topical relevance, linking-page traffic, and anchor-text quality.
● The prospect-list shape, naming the columns: dead competitor URL, inbound-links count, top three referring domains, topical fit, anchor patterns, and whether a replacement asset exists.
As you write it:
● Reference my SEO tool by name; do not recommend tools I did not name.
● Make every filter threshold a specific number, not "high" or "moderate".
● End with a realistic estimate of how many prospects survive filtering, typically 10% to 40% of raw results.
My details: [Insert the competitor domain, the SEO tool you have access to such as Ahrefs, Semrush, or Moz, and your industry or topical focus.]

SEO & Content

Design a Sub-$500 Micro-Survey With Credible Methodology

Designs a rigorous, press-citable micro-survey under $500 with question, screening, sample size, and methodology.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a market research methodologist whose small-budget surveys have been cited by tier-1 business publications. Cheap surveys are easy to dismiss; the discipline is methodological rigour at small scale. Design a complete micro-survey for my chosen data angle. Give me all…

View prompt

Act as a market research methodologist whose small-budget surveys have been cited by tier-1 business publications. Cheap surveys are easy to dismiss; the discipline is methodological rigour at small scale.
Design a complete micro-survey for my chosen data angle. Give me all of this:
● The single provocative question, 25 words or fewer, written exactly as the respondent will see it.
● The answer format, whether single-select, multi-select, a 1-to-5 scale, or open-ended, plus the answer options where they apply.
● Three or more screening criteria that decide who qualifies.
● A sample-size recommendation of at least 200 respondents, with a one-sentence rationale on margin of error.
● A platform recommendation with a one-sentence rationale, and an estimated total cost below $500.
● A press-ready methodology paragraph naming specific values for sample size, screening, geography, collection dates, and platform.
As you design it:
● Keep total cost under $500; if a design runs over, cut sample size before screening rigour.
● Do not write a leading or loaded question; flag and rewrite any draft that primes the respondent.
My details: [Insert the data angle you chose from Prompt 7 or 8, the respondent profile you need such as role, industry, geography, and company size, and the hypothesis you want to test.]

SEO & Content

Mine 10 Link-Magnet Data Angles From My Operations

Surfaces ten citable proprietary data angles from your internal operations for a link-magnet report.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a data marketing strategist who has turned internal company data into reports cited by major business publications. Almost every business sits on proprietary data it has not realised is citable. Identify exactly 10 proprietary data angles I could pull from…

View prompt

Act as a data marketing strategist who has turned internal company data into reports cited by major business publications. Almost every business sits on proprietary data it has not realised is citable.
Identify exactly 10 proprietary data angles I could pull from my internal operations to build a citable link-magnet report. Give me a table with exactly 10 rows and these columns:
● Data-angle name.
● The specific data points needed from my internal system.
● The target publisher type.
● The lead headline statistic, phrased as a specific number and unit, such as "22% increase in X between A and B".
● The anonymisation requirement for that angle.
As you build it:
● Output exactly 10 angles, not eight and not 12.
● Do not propose an angle that needs data I cannot access internally.
● Do not expose customer-identifiable information without anonymisation; state the requirement in every row.
● Aim no more than two angles at the same publisher type.
● After the table, rank the three highest-impact picks, one sentence each.
My details: [Insert your industry and business model, the kinds of internal data you hold such as transactions, behaviour logs, support tickets, and survey responses, and your typical customer profile.]

SEO & Content

Reframe 8 Free Public Datasets Into Link-Worthy Stories

Turns eight free public datasets into reframed, citable story angles with effort estimates.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a data journalism strategist who has built link-magnet content from public datasets. Some of the most-cited data stories involve no original data collection, only a sharp reframe. Identify exactly 8 free public datasets I could combine with my industry expertise…

View prompt

Act as a data journalism strategist who has built link-magnet content from public datasets. Some of the most-cited data stories involve no original data collection, only a sharp reframe.
Identify exactly 8 free public datasets I could combine with my industry expertise to produce a citable, reframed story. Give me a table with exactly 8 rows and these columns:
● Dataset name and URL.
● The reframing angle.
● The specific headline finding the asset would surface.
● The target publisher type.
● The production effort as a specific number of hours, not a range.
As you build it:
● Output exactly 8 dataset pairings, with no dataset repeated.
● Do not propose datasets behind paywalls or ones needing API spend above $100.
● Make every angle reference the dataset's actual fields, not invented ones.
● After the table, name the single quickest win and why it is the lowest-effort, fastest-traction option.
My details: [Insert your industry, the geographic markets you serve, and the audience that would care about your reframed story, such as B2B buyers or journalists in a named vertical.]

SEO & Content

Draft the Disavow File and a Stakeholder Memo

Generates an upload-ready disavow file plus a plain-English stakeholder memo with realistic recovery expectations.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a Search Console operations lead who has submitted more than 50 disavow files. Recovery from a toxic-link penalty usually takes 4 to 8 weeks, because the search engine has to re-crawl the affected domains. Produce the exact disavow file text…

View prompt

Act as a Search Console operations lead who has submitted more than 50 disavow files. Recovery from a toxic-link penalty usually takes 4 to 8 weeks, because the search engine has to re-crawl the affected domains.
Produce the exact disavow file text I will upload to Search Console, plus a short internal memo that sets realistic recovery expectations for a non-technical stakeholder. Give me the answer in two parts:
● The disavow file: one line per domain, each line using the "domain:" prefix, headed by three comment lines noting the date, the property, and the total domain count.
● The stakeholder memo, 200 words or fewer, in plain English, with three short paragraphs on what the disavow does, the realistic 4-to-8-week timeline, and what you will monitor weekly.
As you write it:
● Use the "domain:" prefix for every entry, not raw URLs.
● Include only domains carrying a Disavow verdict in my input.
● Do not promise a specific traffic-recovery percentage, and keep the memo free of hype or apology.
My details: [Insert the Disavow-verdict rows from Prompt 5, each with the domain and one-line reason, plus your property name and the date.]

SEO & Content

Identify Probable PBN Footprints in My Profile

Ranks backlink domains by likelihood of being part of a private blog network using infrastructural signals.

PROMPT PREVIEW

Act as a link-network forensic specialist who has mapped more than 30 private blog networks. A disguised network link looks clean on the surface; the giveaways are infrastructural, not visual. Identify the domains in my backlink profile that are probable private-blog-network participants…

View prompt

Act as a link-network forensic specialist who has mapped more than 30 private blog networks. A disguised network link looks clean on the surface; the giveaways are infrastructural, not visual. Identify the domains in my backlink profile that are probable private-blog-network participants and rank them by likelihood. Give me a table ranked by probability, with these columns:
● Domain.
● Shared-IP-cluster signal, yes or no.
● Outbound-link incoherence signal, yes or no, such as a casino link beside a dental clinic.
● Templated or thin content signal, yes or no.
● Network probability of low, medium, or high, and why it is suspicious in 25 words or fewer, citing a specific signal.
As you build it:
● Flag a domain only when at least two of the three signals are present.
● Show at most 20 domains, ranked by probability.
● Do not auto-recommend a disavow; this prompt only ranks for triage.
● After the table, name the most common signal, the suspected source, and the top domains for the Prompt 5 triage.
My details: [Insert a referring-domain export with, for each domain, the domain, hosting IP if known, three to five outbound links from recent posts, and a one-line content description.]

SEO & Contentprompts.

SEO & Content
prompts.