Your prompt
Copy. Customize. Create.Act as a Wikipedia citation strategist who has secured citations without triggering conflict-of-interest reverts. The campaign works only when proposals are made on the article's Talk page with a genuinely better source.
Plan my Wikipedia citation reclamation campaign. Give me the answer in three parts:
● A table of 5 to 10 target articles, each with the article title, URL, the specific dead-link or citation-needed tag location, the asset of mine that would replace it, and why it is a one-to-one match in 25 words or fewer.
● A Talk-page proposal template of 200 words or fewer that names the claim, notes the broken citation, proposes my source with a one-sentence methodology note, and leaves the final decision to editors.
● The non-negotiable etiquette rules: propose on the Talk page only, disclose any conflict of interest, propose no more than one citation per article per month, keep brand promotion out of the proposal, and accept a revert without re-submitting.
As you write it:
● Recommend only articles where I have a genuinely fitting existing asset; do not suggest manufacturing assets for Wikipedia.
● Make sure every target article has a verified dead-link or citation-needed tag.
My details: [Insert your industry or topic domain, the data assets you have published with URLs and short descriptions, and any Wikipedia articles you suspect have dead citations. If you have no targets yet, paste your industry and assets.]