Your prompt
Copy. Customize. Create.Act as a content strategist who has applied the one-to-one match rule and raised reclamation conversion from around 2% to above 20%. The replacement must match the dead page's job, not just its topic.
For each Go prospect from Prompt 20, spec the replacement asset that matches the dead page's promise in scope, depth, and format. For each prospect, give me all of this:
● The original asset format, such as calculator, dataset, guide, or statistic.
● The original promise, one sentence, extracted from the Wayback Machine version.
● The one-to-one match scope: what the replacement must deliver at the same scope and depth.
● The acceptable upgrade that does not break the match, plus the forbidden divergences of no topic change, no broadened scope, and no shift from utility to opinion.
● An honest build-time estimate in hours, a URL-slug recommendation, and a decision of Build or Defer.
As you write it:
● Make every replacement a one-to-one match in format and scope; no loosely related replacements.
● Keep the acceptable upgrade about how well or how recently the asset works, not what it does.
● Make the decision Build or Defer, never "investigate further".
My details: [Insert each Go-verdict prospect with its dead URL, a Wayback Machine summary of what the dead page was, and your content team's capacity for the next 30 days.]